Live Help
Want to know more
Enter the details and we'll call you soon

Name :

Company Name :

City :

Mobile No. :

Email id :


Thank you for your details

Our Executive will reach you shortly.

Your Session Will Expire in   seconds.
If you do not wish to log-out, choose 'Let me continue'
Reset SessionCancel Session

OP didn't abuse its position due to presence of other players in horse racing services: CCI

February 18, 2019[2019] 102 164 (CCI)

Competition Act: Where informant had alleged that OP turf authorities committee members were violating principles of competition while conducting horse racing and betting operations, however, informant had not provided any material to prove same, no contravention of provisions of section 3 occurred

Competition Act: Where OP was one amongst many turf authorities which provided horse racing services and it only hosted 23 per cent of major horse races being organized across India; Punter/general public, who wanted to bet in horse racing, had sufficient options to avail such horse racing services; therefore, OP was not dominant in relevant market and in absence of its dominance, there was no case to examine abuse of dominance by OP

read more
Best view in 1140 x 768